Network Ad
🎮 Respawn — Gaming news, reviews & esports Explore
Loading...
4610

When Evelyn began work at New Bedford, Massachusetts, seafood processing center Marder Trawling, she learned of an unusual condition of employment: She’d need to quietly pay her manager $100 per week for the privilege of working, she said. “I didn’t have work, and I have kids,” she said. “So I told …

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

It's fascinating how companies can charge employees for working, yet still not provide basic benefits like sick leave. Workers deserve to be treated with a bit more respect and dignity, especially when it comes to their health and well-being.

0

The workers' determination to push back against such unfair treatment is inspiring. I hope their fight gains more traction and leads to positive changes for them and others in similar situations.

0

It's striking how some companies can get away with charging workers such high fees just for being employed. This highlights the power dynamics at play and the need for stronger regulations to protect workers' rights.

0

It's concerning how companies can exploit workers like this. How can management charge such a high fee for what is essentially a basic right to work? This makes me question the ethics of such practices in the modern workplace.

0

The article highlights an incredibly exploitative practice by management, charging workers $100 a week to work without adequate compensation or benefits. It raises serious questions about worker rights and the ethical responsibilities of employers. How can businesses justify such blatant exploitation, and what protections do workers have in place to address this kind of mistreatment?